我使用下面的代码为spherical harmonics functionsY_l^m(在整个球体上规范化4-pi)及其θ导数创建符号Sympy表达式,然后在θ和phi坐标系中的某个等距网格上计算它们:
import numpy as np
from math import pi, cos, sin
import sympy
from sympy import Ynm, simplify, diff, lambdify
from sympy.abc import n,m,theta,phi
resol = 2.5
dtheta_rad_ylm = -resol * pi/180.0
dphi_rad_ylm = resol * pi/180.0
thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm = np.arange(pi+dtheta_rad_ylm/2.0,dtheta_rad_ylm/2.0,dtheta_rad_ylm)
phiarr_rad_ylm = np.arange(0.0,2*pi,dphi_rad_ylm)
phi_grid_rad_ylm, theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm = np.meshgrid(phiarr_rad_ylm, thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm)
lmax = len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm)/2 - 1
nmax = (lmax+1)*(lmax+2)/2
ylms_symm_full = np.zeros((lmax+1, lmax+1, len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm), len(phiarr_rad_ylm)))
dylms_symm_full = np.zeros((lmax+1, lmax+1, len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm), len(phiarr_rad_ylm)))
for n in np.arange(0,lmax+1):
for m in np.arange(0,n+1):
print "generating resol %s, y_%d_%d" % (resol,n,m)
ylm_symbolic = simplify(2 * sympy.sqrt(sympy.pi) * Ynm(n,m,theta,phi).expand(func=True))
dylm_symbolic = simplify(diff(ylm_symbolic, theta))
# activate and deactivate comments for second-question-related error
# error appears later than the first-question-related error!
ylm_lambda = lambdify((theta,phi), sympy.N(ylm_symbolic), "numpy")
dylm_lambda = lambdify((theta,phi), sympy.N(dylm_symbolic), "numpy")
# ylm_lambda = lambdify((theta,phi), ylm_symbolic, "numpy")
# dylm_lambda = lambdify((theta,phi), dylm_symbolic, "numpy")
# activate and deactivate comments for first-question-related error
ylm_symm_full = np.asarray(ylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm), dtype=complex)
dylm_symm_full = np.asarray(dylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm), dtype=complex)
# ylm_symm_full = ylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm)
# dylm_symm_full = dylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm)
if n == 0 and m == 0:
ylm_symm_full = np.tile(ylm_symm_full, (len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm), len(phiarr_rad_ylm)))
dylm_symm_full = np.tile(dylm_symm_full, (len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm), len(phiarr_rad_ylm)))
ylms_symm_full[n,m,:,:] = np.real(ylm_symm_full)
dylms_symm_full[n,m,:,:] = np.real(dylm_symm_full)
还有一些其他的包提供了在不使用符号表达式的情况下生成数值Yμm的功能,比如scipy.special.sph_harm。然而,对于我来说,得到一个“精确”的导数是至关重要的,即不使用任何数值微分方法,例如有限差分(np.gradient)。因此,在得到Yμl^m的符号公式并“尽可能地”简化之后,使用numpy后端创建lambda函数(以便能够进行矢量化计算),然后在网格上计算这些函数。最后我只需要球谐函数的实部(我知道我也可以用Znm而不是Ynm来创建真正的球谐函数,但是…)。在
两个问题:
np.sqrt(9L) = 3.0
),但在本例中有一条错误消息,指出long对象没有属性sqrt。我想这也与lambda函数的生成有关。有没有什么方法可以告诉Sympy每次都以float格式给出符号表达式?或者,更好的是,以某种方式修改lambdify调用?在如果您想检查这些问题,代码块应该是独立的和可测试的。只要去掉sympy.N和np.A阵列表达。第一个问题与前面出现的错误有关。你的最大发电量是35,大约需要10-15分钟。在
提前感谢您的帮助!在
更新:以下是一些最小的、完整的、可验证的示例。对于两者,请导入所需的软件包:
^{pr2}$错误1:an=31,m=1处的对象数据类型问题:
# minimal, complete and verifiable example (MCVe) #1
# error message:
#---> 43 dylms_symm_full[n,m,:,:] = np.real(dylm_symm_full)
#TypeError: can't convert complex to float
ylm_symbolic = simplify(2 * sympy.sqrt(sympy.pi) * Ynm(31,1,theta,phi).expand(func=True))
dylm_symbolic = simplify(diff(ylm_symbolic, theta))
ylm_lambda = lambdify((theta,phi), ylm_symbolic, "numpy")
dylm_lambda = lambdify((theta,phi), dylm_symbolic, "numpy")
ylm_symm_full = ylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm)
dylm_symm_full = dylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm)
ylms_symm_full = np.zeros((len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm), len(phiarr_rad_ylm)))
dylms_symm_full = np.zeros((len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm), len(phiarr_rad_ylm)))
ylms_symm_full[:,:] = np.real(ylm_symm_full)
dylms_symm_full[:,:] = np.real(dylm_symm_full)
print ylm_symm_full
print dylm_symm_full
错误2:n=32,m=29时的长sqrt属性问题:
# minimal, complete and verifiable example (MCVe) #2
# error message:
#---> 33 ylm_symm_full = np.asarray(ylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm), dtype=complex)
#/opt/local/anaconda/anaconda-2.2.0/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/__init__.pyc in <lambda>(_Dummy_4374, _Dummy_4375)
#AttributeError: 'long' object has no attribute 'sqrt'
ylm_symbolic = simplify(2 * sympy.sqrt(sympy.pi) * Ynm(32,29,theta,phi).expand(func=True))
dylm_symbolic = simplify(diff(ylm_symbolic, theta))
ylm_lambda = lambdify((theta,phi), ylm_symbolic, "numpy")
dylm_lambda = lambdify((theta,phi), dylm_symbolic, "numpy")
ylm_symm_full = np.asarray(ylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm), dtype=complex)
dylm_symm_full = np.asarray(dylm_lambda(theta_grid_rad_ylm_symm, phi_grid_rad_ylm), dtype=complex)
ylms_symm_full = np.zeros((len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm), len(phiarr_rad_ylm)))
dylms_symm_full = np.zeros((len(thetaarr_rad_ylm_symm), len(phiarr_rad_ylm)))
ylms_symm_full[:,:] = np.real(ylm_symm_full)
dylms_symm_full[:,:] = np.real(dylm_symm_full)
print ylm_symbolic # the symbolic Y_32^29 expression
print type(175844649714253329810) # the number that causes the problem
为什么你的代码有时会生成一个对象数组,这不是没有MCVe就很难回答的问题——它不能只是偶尔发生,它必须是可重复的。在
但是,如果数组是object,则很容易将其转换为complex with
^{1}$使用
^{pr2}$copy=False
参数,您可以将其应用于所有结果,而无需太多计算成本。在对象版本的元素不是元组;它们是标量复值,只是这样打印。在
有些数学运算确实“渗透”到对象数组的元素,但
real
不是其中之一。所以正如您所注意到的,np.real(arrO)
并不能产生您想要的结果。在更多地查看您的代码,包括在屏幕上滚动的内容,我看到您正在使用:
这和我的
astype(complex, copy=False)
是一样的。在对于已经很复杂的阵列,计算成本是最小的。对于一个对象数组,它必须创建一个新的数组,并且成本更高。但是,如果您无法通过
sympy
来确定是在创建对象数组,那么您必须承受这样的代价。在相关问题 更多 >
编程相关推荐